1953 Movie: Invaders From Mars

March 27, 2011 on 4:20 pm | In ALIEN ABDUCTION, CELEBRITIES, extraterrestrial, Flying Saucers, History, space alien, UFO PICTURES, UFO VIDEOS, UFOlogy, Unidentified Flying Object | No Comments

1953 Movie: Invaders From Mars

Last night I indulged myself by watching one of my favorite classic UFO movies called “Invaders From Mars”. It was produced in 1953, directed by William Cameron Menzies, written by Richard Blake, and starred Helena Carter, Arthur Franz, and Jimmy Hunt.

This movie, Invaders From Mars is a favorite amongst friends and family as it would be re-released in theaters while I was growing up and at the drive-ins. The television commercials were eerie as the trailer had all the elements that would make a kid want to make a bee line to the movies. It broke a lot of ground in the Martian invasion, UFO and flying saucer genres.

It featured then, what many today call the alien abduction phenomenon almost 15 years before the famous Barney and Betty Hill story that appeared in LOOK magazine in the early 1960s. The story had all the elements, people kidnapped, implants put into people’s brains, government conspiracies and the coolest, eeriest looking alien overlord type that still stands up today regarding make up and special effects. Invaders From Mars was way ahead of it’s time and on a modest filming budget still has the chills and surrealism the film achieved even in today’s high definition age.

Great plot, lots of heroic action and focuses on the story of a young boy who sees a flying saucer land in a field near his home. Soon, people begin disappearing and return with strange behavior and the boy, David, notices they’ve got a mark on the backs of their necks. David ends up at the police station after a neighborhood girl is abducted and sets fire to her home. David’s father and the girl’s father both work on a top secret project at a nearby base as do several of the people in the town. At the station David’s wild story of flying saucers and strange people puts him in a cell where a beautiful health care worker played by Helena Carter arrives and takes pity on the boy. David’s parents arrive, now under the power of the Martians to retrieve him but Dr. Pat Blake (Carter), refuses. Soon the police chief and some military brass are under the Martian’s control and it’s up to Dr. Carter, David, and Dr. Stuart Kelston, played by Arthur Franz, to race against time to alert the authorities and thwart the Martians. Yes, Invaders From Mars has it all except the mush.

If you haven’t seen Invaders From Mars you’re missing out. Yes there was a remake in the 1980s which was faithful to the original but the 1953 classic can’t be touched. I bring this up because I’ve seen several edited versions of this movie over the years and didn’t realize that it had been altered several times. There are several with different endings, one that was way ahead of the Twilight Zone and EC Comics ironic-twist-at-the-end formula, but in the version I saw last night on Netflix, there was an added scene I had not known existed and it blew me away.

In this version of Invaders From Mars, the filmmakers added footage to explain the area of UFOlogy and it was quite alarming. The sequence takes place amongst the three principal characters of David, Dr. Blake, and Dr. Kelston who runs the local observatory where Jimmy, an amateur astronomer likes to frequent. Kelston it turns out had been studying UFOs and goes into a lengthy, quite accurate and broad explanation about UFOs that looks like one of those 1950s educational films. I mean he really goes into depth to the point he actually makes a convincing argument for the alien visitation or extraterrestrial hypothesis. He covers the infamous “Lubbock Lights” story with photos, the case of Capt. Thomas F. Mantell of the Kentucky Air National Guard whose plane crashed while in pursuit of a UFO in January 1948. A highly publicized case at the time as theories of “death rays” were tossed about as an explanation to Mantell’s death. Not all the data in this particular scene is accurate science and has some speculation that by today’s standards of UFOlogy might not hold up but it’s amazing that the producers went to such lengths with this particular segment. In addition, there is something in this movie that most miss. At no time do the “invaders” state that they’re from outer space! It’s the military and the scientists who assume so. In a scene where the invaders are asked about their leader, the creepy bodiless octopus head in a bubble, the invaders state that their leader is the epitome of human evolution. Note, didn’t say “Martian”. Get the picture yet?

That added footage came after the main story had been filmed and one can see that the character David had grown a bit during the time period. This scene is just the extra punch that makes Invaders From Mars that must-have UFO movie alongside such classics as “Unidentified Flying Objects: The True Story Of Flying Saucers”, “The Bamboo Saucer”, and “Earth vs The Flying Saucers” featuring the great Ray Harryhausen’s special effects.

So hunt around for the version of Invaders From Mars that I’m mentioning which according to the IMDB (Internet Movie Database) which you can read by clicking HERE. I won’t go into the endings of the three versions, American, European, and re-edited American versions as the endings are a surprise. So do yourself a treat and hunt for all three versions and enjoy a classic in UFO culture that stands the test of time.

Here you can see the original theatrical trailer for Invaders From Mars:

Here you can see a tribute to the movie and it’s eerie musical score. One of the scariest music scores as it’s deceptive. It starts off in some form of military march but soon evolves into a melody that suggests hidden mystery and a haunting otherworldly menace.

Incoming search terms:

  • кино мафия сом
  • movie invaders from Mars
  • 1953 film invaders from mars introd
  • movie invaders
  • movieinvaders com
  • psychiatric hospital alien abduction
  • space invaders from mars the movie
  • stills from 1953 movie invaders from mars
  • the invaders ufo movie
  • the movie invaders from mars

No Virginia, There Are No Extraterrestrials Visiting Earth

July 9, 2010 on 7:14 am | In ALIEN ABDUCTION, Close Encounter Of The First Kind, extraterrestrial, Flying Saucers, History, Paranormal, Roswell, Science, space alien, UFOs, Unidentified Flying Object | 13 Comments

I know that I will piss off lots of people but this is a prelude to a longer essay pointing out that of this date not one shred of proof has yet come to the table that extraterrestrials are visiting Earth, have visited Earth, or are on their way.

Sure there’s lots of “evidence” but without solid physical proof it’s still just ONE theory as to the origin of SOME UFOs.

What that means is that there are many theories as to the origins of some UFO reports. Theories like this include top secret government craft that we know has been the case several times. That some UFOs have been and are advanced private air and spacecraft that are unregistered. That some UFOs may be life forms we’ve yet to classify.

There are many theories and the most exciting being that some UFOs are of extraterrestrial origin. That theory alone has spawned more theories and speculation to the point of overwhelm. There are societies, religions, groups that claim to have the inside knowledge and far too many times has led to disaster and fraud. You’ve got to be on your toes for this.

I know there are some who’ll point to the Billy Meier case. A Swiss farmer who years ago presented several startling films, pictures, and books regarding his experiences. Sure it’s all entertaining and amazing but where is the physical proof? If these aliens meant so well it’s certain they’re aware that no one in government and science believes them, so why the stonewalling? It’s simple, they’re either incredibly stupid or they don’t exist. It doesn’t get any more complicated than that.

Oh, the Betty and Barney Hill case? One of the classics of this phenomenon. A couple from America claimed to have been observant of and abducted by extraterrestrials. An exciting case no doubt, but where is the physical proof?

Roswell. The mother of all UFO incidents. Lots of documents, speculation, books, tv, movies, but where is the physical proof?

Not one government, friend nor foe has come forward with any physical proof whatsoever in over 60 years of this phenomenon.

Why? Ask yourself “Why?”.

Now, does this mean that extraterrestrials and/or their mechanisms hasn’t or aren’t visiting Earth? No. What it means is that there is no physical proof to support it as conclusive.

There’s much more and even the trace cases, samples of flora, fauna, soil of areas where a UFO report has occurred are nothing more than evidence that something occurred or affected said at the location of a UFO report.

Let’s get oriented here as we may be missing out on a more prosaic but unsettling theory with far more physical evidence but shunned by even the most fervent UFO fan. That theory I’ll deal with in a longer essay as it would be so disturbing, if true, than any visit by extraterrestrials.

So again, at present, not one iota of proof has emerged to conclude that ETs are in any way, shape, or form a part of our development on Earth. That could change tomorrow or a year from now or a century from now, but as of right now there just isn’t anything. Sorry to hurt the feelings of those awaiting a spectacular landing and the emergence of the “Space Brothers” who’ll bring in a new age of benevolence but that’s so far from the farm there’s no way you can milk the cows.

So stand by for a further dissertation.

In the meantime, when someone says “extraterrestrials did this or that”, ask them to show you the PROOF or keep it in the realm of the anecdotal for now.

Incoming search terms:

  • extraterrestrial visits to earth
  • extraterrestrials in virginia

THEORY SUGGESTS MOSQITOES AS SOURCE OF UFO ABDUCTION ACCOUNTS

June 18, 2010 on 7:37 pm | In ALIEN ABDUCTION, Close Encounter Of The First Kind, extraterrestrial, Paranormal, space alien, UFOs | 2 Comments

I thought I’d heard it all up until now.

That UFO abductees had all sorts of disorders and then
that abductees were reliving past life stuff and that there
was post prenatal configurations of the unconscious mind.

Now here’s a new one:

Mosquitoes.

Yes, you read that right, mosquitoes. That UFO abductees
are actually experiencing latent memories of mosquito
bites. That when mosquitoes bite they create a psychological
cascade of unconscious fears that pile up and up and manifest
as delusions so real that we can’t tell the difference.

The similarities of bug eyed aliens with long probes extracting
fluids is so traumatizing that the mind fills in the blanks,
exaggerates and since some mosquito bites can cause
delirium like as in malaria, abductees are misinterpreting the
mosquito intrusions.

Now we know mosquitoes have been the number one cause
of death of humans since who knows when as they carry any
number of diseases and do transmit genetic material from
other animals but this explanation just went so over the top
as a grasping of straws that I had to post it.

Has anyone ever heard of this before?

Best,
Greg
ufomafia.com

PIXAR’s CARS Takes On UFOs

November 22, 2009 on 9:10 pm | In ALIEN ABDUCTION, CELEBRITIES, Crop Circles, extraterrestrial, Flying Saucers, History, NEWS, Social Networking, UFOs | No Comments

PIXAR’s CARS Takes On UFOs

I’d heard about this a while back and it just posted to their YouTube site a few days ago.

It’s charming, exciting, and of course a real gutbuster of a laugh.

These shorts are amazing. Studios should do more shorts and show them at theatres. I guess the reason they don’t is because the shorts are better than the movies that follow them.

Anyway, as someone who is all up into UFOs and chats with all the top UFOlogists daily, this PIXAR short is a welcomed good spirited look at the phenomenon.

WATCH THE PIXAR CARS UFO VIDEO BY CLICKING HERE!

Incoming search terms:

  • alien pixars cars
  • cars 1 ufo
  • celebrities and crop circles
  • pixar cars aliens

NORTH HAMPSHIRE MAN CLAIMS VIDEO SHOWS UFO CAPTURING BUFFALO

November 6, 2009 on 12:45 am | In ALIEN ABDUCTION, UFO PICTURES, UFO VIDEOS, Unidentified Flying Object | No Comments

MAN VIDEOS APPARENT UFO CAPTURING A WATER BUFFALO

Here’s one of those UFO stories that you toss to the side at first glance as it focuses on a North Hampshire man named Derek Bridges who used his video camera to capture what he says is a UFO levitating a water buffalo up into it.

The video isn’t crystal clear but it has garnered quite the amount of international interest.

So for your perusal, or amusement you can read the story by clicking this link and you can see the video below.

UFO SIGHTINGS IN BRITAIN TRIPLE THIS YEAR

September 20, 2009 on 12:39 am | In ALIEN ABDUCTION, Crop Circles, CRYPTOZOOLOGY, extraterrestrial, Flying Saucers, History, message board, Outer Space, Paranormal, Science, Social Networking, space alien, UFO CRASHES, UFO PICTURES, UFO VIDEOS, UFOs, Unidentified Flying Object | No Comments

UFO Sightings In Britain Triple This Year

Here’s an alarming item from the UK’s Telegraph newspaper. It’s a report on the statistics of UFO sightings over this year and the results are that the sightings number has tripled so far. It’s only September but the amount of UFO sightings in this year’s unprecedented UFO flap has broken records.

Dr. David Clarke, noted UFO expert and journalism professional is quoted several times in the story giving details about the importance of this issue.

Go ahead and click this link to read more about this astounding revelation.

DISCUSS THIS STORY IN OUR UFO MAFIA FORUM

The Swiss Look At UFO Disclosures

August 23, 2009 on 9:56 pm | In ALIEN ABDUCTION, Crop Circles, extraterrestrial, Flying Saucers, History, JPL, message board, NASA, Outer Space, Paranormal, Science, Social Networking, space alien, UFO CRASHES, UFO PICTURES, UFO VIDEOS, UFOs, Unidentified Flying Object | No Comments

Swiss look at the Britain’s UFO disclosures

This article is very interesting because in this Swiss newspaper, they not only look at the recent mega disclosures by the British Government regarding UFOs, but the Swiss are asking what their own government may know about the controversy.

The number of files released by the UK are such to the degree that it will take some while as experts and the public pour over them.

There’s no telling if the Swiss Government has an extensive UFO file that the Swiss people may petition to reveal. If so it would be a coup as it would add to the mountain of documentation already released by countries such as the UK, France, Mexico, Brazil, and Russia.

Why the U.S. Government doesn’t fall in with this honesty nor the Australian government says much doesn’t it?

Follow up to the ABC News Primetime UFOs/alien abduction segment

August 20, 2009 on 7:41 am | In ALIEN ABDUCTION, Crop Circles, extraterrestrial, Flying Saucers, History, message board, Outer Space, Paranormal, Science, space alien, UFO PICTURES, UFO VIDEOS, UFOs, Unidentified Flying Object | 4 Comments

In all fairness I have to say not only was I close but also surprised.

This segment started out exactly as I had suspected. The first mistake was when the narrator Ju Ju Chang stated that the people to be interviewed all “believe in UFOs”.

That set my teeth on edge right there. Not only was I now convinced I was in store for more half-assed reporting and segment direction. To say someone believes in UFOs is absurd. You cannot believe in a UFO as UFO means only Unidentified Flying Object. It’s a scientific term meaning something flying that convention cannot explain. The more proper statement would have been that the persons to be interviewed “believe they’ve been in contact with extraterrestrials”. See, it’s best to say that some UFOs are theorized to be of extraterrestrial origin. There are many theories as to what some UFOs may be.

Next the segment moved onto a more stable approach by finally letting abductees relate their experiences. Chang asked some safe but important questions but they were so lightweight they left more questions than answers. It might have served ABC and the public more if the full subject of abduction were addressed and to what solid scientific methods have, are, and should be employed to validate the phenomena. Has anyone been fitted with a tracking device like we use for convicts who are under house arrest? If not, why not? How long has the phenomenon been going on? How widespread is it?

This segment only safely surfed the issue and the director/producer just had to use quick cuts to movies and unexplained photographs. In other words it was dressed up to within an inch of it’s life as a UFO entertainment piece instead of an informative look on one of the most widespread phenomena of our age. Of course it had to segue’ into what the psychiatric professionals had to evaluate and instead of discussing the findings of the most important psychiatrist to look into the issue, they glance over it to more speculation and nebulous conclusions.

The level of sloppiness wasn’t as high as I had expected although close. It was more of an approach that said the issue is important enough to warrant a glance but no teeth got sunk into this shark.

Dr. Susan Clancy and her evaluation of the phenomena is again so far off base regarding the types of abductions and the wide array of circumstances that to us who have studied, she sounds like a kindergarten colleague. She may mean well, but she’s got a heck of a lot of homework to do. She states that the people she’s examined or interviewed aren’t crazy and that’s what several experts have stated during the past 10 years or so. This is in contrast to what used to be done to people not only who’ve claimed to have been abducted but also just witnesses, as in the old days they would have been sent to a psychiatric hospital and I would have said, or worse, but I can’t think of anything worse than being sent to a psychiatric hospital other than being sent to one in Siberia.

Will this news segment open up dialogue? Hopefully it will but only if that dialogue moves in the direction of the solid application of real science and real detective work. We need that science and detective work to get to the bottom of this issue as well as weed out the charlatans.

The ride ain’t over yet folks.

ABC News: Abducted by Aliens: Believers Tell Their Stories…NOT!

August 18, 2009 on 4:29 pm | In ALIEN ABDUCTION, extraterrestrial, Flying Saucers, History, message board, Outer Space, Paranormal, Science, Social Networking, space alien, UFO PICTURES, UFO VIDEOS, UFOs, Unidentified Flying Object | 5 Comments

ABC News: Abducted by Aliens: Believers Tell Their Stories

Well ABC News is at it again. This time it’s a lengthy news story and news segment looking at the UFO/alien abduction phenomenon.

Most of us UFOlogists hold ABC with not a grain of salt but with blatant disdain because of their sloppy reporting regarding UFOs. I’ll be the first one to say that the UFO phenomenon needs to be examined by professionals of all fields and that raw data processed and presented. That would be the ideal scene but rarely executed. I’ll say honestly that yes, the UFO phenomenon is rife with fraud, shenanigans, spite, backstabbing, and the whole gambit of human foibles, but in all fairness the UFO phenomenon is also full of incredibly reliable, honest, intelligent, credible witnesses, experts, and data that is so overwhelming in it’s breath and scope it boggles the mind.

In the mainstream news’ case, the issue hasn’t been covered in ratio to the interest by the public. There are mountains of official government documents and living witnesses of high rank who are available for examination and questioning but the news media somehow slides by them to find persons who contribute in no way to the further investigation of this issue with the sincerity and clarity that is long overdue.

After reading this latest article it does well. It makes no evaluations of the participants and is edited well. You get to read from the people themselves what they believe to be true. All that’s well and good but too good to be true as the article typically degrades at the end with those pesky evaluations from the headshrinkers that encompass all UFO abductions being explained away as “sleep paralysis”. For some reason this Harvard trained psychologist Dr. Susan Clancy is bent on putting “sleep paralysis” as the explanation to every alien abduction story. What she doesn’t do, which any professional should do, is look at the alien abduction incidents THAT OCCURRED WHILST THE PERSONS WERE WIDE AWAKE. Not only were these abductees wide awake, in full recall of what occured but in many instances there were multiple people abducted and sometimes in broad daylight. These accounts are available from the research presented by experts going on for decades.

Pop culture would have you believe all abductees are rural types when in fact they span the entire spectrum of race, religion, culture, and occupations. As for the stellar lineup of whistleblowers we’ve got heads of state, generals, colonels, ministers, scientists, astronauts and cosmonauts, and more.

For some reason these incidents where the persons/victims/abductees were wide awake and multiple abductees at that, escaped the good doctor. One would think that gathering scientific data would encompass something important like RESEARCHING THE EVIDENCE but I guess Harvard doesn’t have to do that. They make so much money from the big drug pharmaceutical companies they don’t have to have real science done, they along with the rest of the psychiatric industry just make up new disorders, classify them as real and then get the pharmaceutical companies to dish out deadly mind altering drugs to ‘cure’ the disorder that isn’t real in the first place.

Methinks one day soon they’ll come up with a drug for the “alien abduction syndrome” and have abductees forced on these drugs.

What’s really tragic is that ABC News is giving Dr. Clancy a soapbox but doesn’t mention the most famous Harvard alum, the Pulitzer Prize Winning author and former head of Harvard’s Psychiatric Division, the late Dr. John E. Mack. Dr. Mack delved into the UFO alien abduction issue almost 20 years ago to prove it was the product of some form of psychological disorder or two. When he did the real, down to earth scientific investigation he ended up bucking the system by presenting his findings that the phenom was indeed real and required more research and especially in the way we evaluate reality. That got Dr. Mack in a mess of trouble with Harvard and for the first time in it’s history, Harvard tried to get rid of Dr. Mack, a tenured professor! We all poured in our support for Dr. Mack and Harvard was defeated and re-instated the good doctor. Ironic for me that in all his studies and travels Dr. Mack ended up moving into my neighborhood to further his studies in the Hudson Valley of New York, Dutchess County at that. I had the luck to briefly interview Dr. Mack at the 50th Anniversary of the Roswell Incident. Go figure.

I’m going to watch the broadcast as well to see if ABC, Ju Ju Chang the correspondent, and Dr. Clancy are going to present the solid evidence that is available especially the government released documents from the U.S., it’s allies, and enemies.

Seems like every country and their brother is forking over formerly classified UFO documents nowadays.

I wonder why?

DISCUSS THIS ISSUE IN OUR UFO MAFIA FORUM

Incoming search terms:

  • hudson valley abductions of aliens
  • abc special on aliens
  • alien abduction tv series
  • alien abduction tv special
  • hudson valley alien abductions
  • television documents on alien abduction
  • tv special alien abduction

ABC News’ Ju Ju Chang Looks At The UFO/Abduction Issue

August 18, 2009 on 3:56 pm | In ALIEN ABDUCTION, extraterrestrial, Flying Saucers, History, message board, Outer Space, Paranormal, space alien, UFO PICTURES, UFO VIDEOS, UFOs, Unidentified Flying Object | No Comments

ABC News’ Ju Ju Chang Looks At The UFO/Alien Abduction Issue

Folks,

It started promising but quickly degraded into the typical mainstream media mediocrity.

As soon as she brings in a headshrinker named Dr. Susan Clancy, yes that Dr. Susan Clancy, things go
downhill from there.

She doesn’t mention Dr. John E. Mack’s research nor the physical evidence, nor the mountains of
documentation.

This is just a new wave of mainstream media looks into UFOs because their ratings are down and I have
an army of friends in the news business who tell me on a daily basis they have to do more coverage of
UFOs and the paranormal because they’re losing money pushing the typical hypnosis they call news.

Money is the issue here and they want to cover the issue without having to treat it seriously. I’m wondering
how many UFOlogists they’ve asked.

DISCUSS THIS STORY IN OUR UFO MAFIA MESSAGE BOARD FORUM

Entries and comments feeds. Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^ Powered by WordPress with jd-nebula-3c theme design by John Doe.

Bad Behavior has blocked 85 access attempts in the last 7 days.