Okay so here we have another turnabout in the “Does life exist on Mars” debate. Today it was announced by NASA that photos of the red planet indicate that there may be flowing water on Mars thus bolstering the possibility of life on Mars.
That’s a longshot assumption but at least they’re still looking. However, we’ve sent numerous probes to Mars and only one was designed to search for life for some unknown reason. That was the Viking probe sent in the 1970s. Our Mars probes and Europe’s probes have found everything except life on Mars. The European Space Agency’s last probe, Beagle, crashed or disappeared and it was designed to search for life. All the other accompanying ESA probes worked except that one.
Needless to say, with NASA’s budget cut and thousands of their employees kicked to the curb with no hope of employment in the near future, if there are any secrets to be told about what NASA really knows, it will come out as those paychecks and unemployment checks run out.
This discovery by no means shows that there is life on Mars, but it does add to the evidence that points to either there is life there in some form or another. Considering the stonewalling the U.S. Government has engaged in regarding the extraterrestrial or space alien subject, the only way any disclosure will come about is if there’s money to be had in saying so.
Stay tuned is all I have to say.
Incoming search terms:
- mars photos 2011
- mars pictures 2011
- NEW mars pictures 2011
- new mars photos 2011
- nasa telescope
- nasa mars pictures 2011
- latest mars pictures 2011
- nasa outer space pictures
- nasa ufo pictures
- ufo space
This is another outstanding example of scientists making a discovery about the resiliency of life and it’s building blocks.
Just a few weeks ago scientists announced the discovery of bacteria found in California that use arsenic instead of phosphorous to sustain themselves. That alone flipped the history books over on their ends as it says that life uses other sources outside of the standard profile and can utilize other materials.
Now this new story, which you can read by CLICKING HERE details how scientists found amino acids, the building blocks of life inside meteorites whose internal heat had reached an estimated 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit!
No one believed previously in the scientific community that amino acids could exist at such extreme temperatures, considering the Sun’s surface is 11,000 degrees this is something that says alot.
This is another major step up for exobiologists as it proves that the building blocks of life can exist in extremes hitherto believed impossible. This also adds to the theory that those building blocks could have arrived on Earth via such asteroid and meteor impacts of the past providing that footstool that life as we know it could stand on and take root and develop into us.
One might also theorize that these amino acids are just common to the process of matter configuration and may have developed on Earth during it’s formation as well as from the bombardment of extraplanetary bodies such as meteorites and asteroids and comets.
Amino acids are necessary for the development and sustaining of life. Of that there is no doubt. However, for them to exist inside a rocky structure that reached heated levels of such extremes of thousands of degrees says alot that scientists can now examine and restructure the scientific data.
It’s becoming quite clear, almost conclusive that life is a phenomenon that exists where conditions permit not only on Earth but in our solar system and throughout the known Universe. The question of whether life exists in the Universe should not even be asked anymore, the questions now should be that what forms has it taken, have we encountered any from bacterial to advanced, and what causes and effects may have occurred or will occur.
This is an exciting time for science and changes the speculation spectrum. This is where UFOlogy should be, side by side with science, not in constant conflict and undermining and that goes for scientists as well.
The two discoveries detailed here are the two out of three primary points in the debate regarding extraterrestrial life. There’s only one point left and that’s validation of it with discovery of such. It may have already occurred or it may be in the process of being validated. More than likely we’ll hear of bacterial or microbial life having been discovered and validated and the story regarding Martian meteorites with fossilized bacteria in them may be that validation.
The subject of extraterrestrial life has been a thorn in the side of government, especially the U.S. Government for over half a century. It is the only government presenting such overwhelmingly documented resistance, attack, and retribution toward citizens, scientists, military, and journalists who’ve ventured into the realm of researching the possibility or reality of any form of extraterrestrial contact. Why this occurs is a debate all unto itself but one can rest assured it has something to do with political and social and monetary investments that are governed by insidious sources who fear such a discovery would undermine their goals.
Just business as usual on Earth.
This must have been some sight for folks out in the midwest.
When these meteors roll in at this speed and this size they put on quite a show and often shake folks up.
You can see several videos and pictures of this fireball, meteor by clicking this link
Incoming search terms:
- bigfoot sightings map
Well let’s hope that this object detected by the Hubble Telescope is quickly identified and left to rest. Reason being, that when such events occur they may spawn any number of scam artists and crackpots who turn the situation into an incident where people get defrauded or even injured or killed.
Superstitious people and people who are just ignorant to the facts often fall prey to these cons so we endorse using sound science first and that’s just what we should do.
Incoming search terms:
- nasa hubble telescope
- hubble telescope
- hubble telescope pictures
- hubble telescope ufo
- hubble telescope images
- nasa news
- hubble ufo
- nasa hubble
- nasa hubble images
- hubble telescope ufo pictures
According to this story, NASA and other space officials are bewildered regarding an object that will speed past Earth on Wednesday January 13, 2010.
The object won’t hit Earth but it’s presence confounds the experts.
This has the ingredients of a panic attack story as it is on the 13th of a month and it is a mysterious object in outer space.
Just keep your shirts on and don’t fall for any doomsday shenanigans folks.
Here’s an alarming item from the UK’s Telegraph newspaper. It’s a report on the statistics of UFO sightings over this year and the results are that the sightings number has tripled so far. It’s only September but the amount of UFO sightings in this year’s unprecedented UFO flap has broken records.
Dr. David Clarke, noted UFO expert and journalism professional is quoted several times in the story giving details about the importance of this issue.
Go ahead and click this link to read more about this astounding revelation.
This article is very interesting because in this Swiss newspaper, they not only look at the recent mega disclosures by the British Government regarding UFOs, but the Swiss are asking what their own government may know about the controversy.
The number of files released by the UK are such to the degree that it will take some while as experts and the public pour over them.
There’s no telling if the Swiss Government has an extensive UFO file that the Swiss people may petition to reveal. If so it would be a coup as it would add to the mountain of documentation already released by countries such as the UK, France, Mexico, Brazil, and Russia.
Why the U.S. Government doesn’t fall in with this honesty nor the Australian government says much doesn’t it?
In all fairness I have to say not only was I close but also surprised.
This segment started out exactly as I had suspected. The first mistake was when the narrator Ju Ju Chang stated that the people to be interviewed all “believe in UFOs”.
That set my teeth on edge right there. Not only was I now convinced I was in store for more half-assed reporting and segment direction. To say someone believes in UFOs is absurd. You cannot believe in a UFO as UFO means only Unidentified Flying Object. It’s a scientific term meaning something flying that convention cannot explain. The more proper statement would have been that the persons to be interviewed “believe they’ve been in contact with extraterrestrials”. See, it’s best to say that some UFOs are theorized to be of extraterrestrial origin. There are many theories as to what some UFOs may be.
Next the segment moved onto a more stable approach by finally letting abductees relate their experiences. Chang asked some safe but important questions but they were so lightweight they left more questions than answers. It might have served ABC and the public more if the full subject of abduction were addressed and to what solid scientific methods have, are, and should be employed to validate the phenomena. Has anyone been fitted with a tracking device like we use for convicts who are under house arrest? If not, why not? How long has the phenomenon been going on? How widespread is it?
This segment only safely surfed the issue and the director/producer just had to use quick cuts to movies and unexplained photographs. In other words it was dressed up to within an inch of it’s life as a UFO entertainment piece instead of an informative look on one of the most widespread phenomena of our age. Of course it had to segue’ into what the psychiatric professionals had to evaluate and instead of discussing the findings of the most important psychiatrist to look into the issue, they glance over it to more speculation and nebulous conclusions.
The level of sloppiness wasn’t as high as I had expected although close. It was more of an approach that said the issue is important enough to warrant a glance but no teeth got sunk into this shark.
Dr. Susan Clancy and her evaluation of the phenomena is again so far off base regarding the types of abductions and the wide array of circumstances that to us who have studied, she sounds like a kindergarten colleague. She may mean well, but she’s got a heck of a lot of homework to do. She states that the people she’s examined or interviewed aren’t crazy and that’s what several experts have stated during the past 10 years or so. This is in contrast to what used to be done to people not only who’ve claimed to have been abducted but also just witnesses, as in the old days they would have been sent to a psychiatric hospital and I would have said, or worse, but I can’t think of anything worse than being sent to a psychiatric hospital other than being sent to one in Siberia.
Will this news segment open up dialogue? Hopefully it will but only if that dialogue moves in the direction of the solid application of real science and real detective work. We need that science and detective work to get to the bottom of this issue as well as weed out the charlatans.
The ride ain’t over yet folks.
Well ABC News is at it again. This time it’s a lengthy news story and news segment looking at the UFO/alien abduction phenomenon.
Most of us UFOlogists hold ABC with not a grain of salt but with blatant disdain because of their sloppy reporting regarding UFOs. I’ll be the first one to say that the UFO phenomenon needs to be examined by professionals of all fields and that raw data processed and presented. That would be the ideal scene but rarely executed. I’ll say honestly that yes, the UFO phenomenon is rife with fraud, shenanigans, spite, backstabbing, and the whole gambit of human foibles, but in all fairness the UFO phenomenon is also full of incredibly reliable, honest, intelligent, credible witnesses, experts, and data that is so overwhelming in it’s breath and scope it boggles the mind.
In the mainstream news’ case, the issue hasn’t been covered in ratio to the interest by the public. There are mountains of official government documents and living witnesses of high rank who are available for examination and questioning but the news media somehow slides by them to find persons who contribute in no way to the further investigation of this issue with the sincerity and clarity that is long overdue.
After reading this latest article it does well. It makes no evaluations of the participants and is edited well. You get to read from the people themselves what they believe to be true. All that’s well and good but too good to be true as the article typically degrades at the end with those pesky evaluations from the headshrinkers that encompass all UFO abductions being explained away as “sleep paralysis”. For some reason this Harvard trained psychologist Dr. Susan Clancy is bent on putting “sleep paralysis” as the explanation to every alien abduction story. What she doesn’t do, which any professional should do, is look at the alien abduction incidents THAT OCCURRED WHILST THE PERSONS WERE WIDE AWAKE. Not only were these abductees wide awake, in full recall of what occured but in many instances there were multiple people abducted and sometimes in broad daylight. These accounts are available from the research presented by experts going on for decades.
Pop culture would have you believe all abductees are rural types when in fact they span the entire spectrum of race, religion, culture, and occupations. As for the stellar lineup of whistleblowers we’ve got heads of state, generals, colonels, ministers, scientists, astronauts and cosmonauts, and more.
For some reason these incidents where the persons/victims/abductees were wide awake and multiple abductees at that, escaped the good doctor. One would think that gathering scientific data would encompass something important like RESEARCHING THE EVIDENCE but I guess Harvard doesn’t have to do that. They make so much money from the big drug pharmaceutical companies they don’t have to have real science done, they along with the rest of the psychiatric industry just make up new disorders, classify them as real and then get the pharmaceutical companies to dish out deadly mind altering drugs to ‘cure’ the disorder that isn’t real in the first place.
Methinks one day soon they’ll come up with a drug for the “alien abduction syndrome” and have abductees forced on these drugs.
What’s really tragic is that ABC News is giving Dr. Clancy a soapbox but doesn’t mention the most famous Harvard alum, the Pulitzer Prize Winning author and former head of Harvard’s Psychiatric Division, the late Dr. John E. Mack. Dr. Mack delved into the UFO alien abduction issue almost 20 years ago to prove it was the product of some form of psychological disorder or two. When he did the real, down to earth scientific investigation he ended up bucking the system by presenting his findings that the phenom was indeed real and required more research and especially in the way we evaluate reality. That got Dr. Mack in a mess of trouble with Harvard and for the first time in it’s history, Harvard tried to get rid of Dr. Mack, a tenured professor! We all poured in our support for Dr. Mack and Harvard was defeated and re-instated the good doctor. Ironic for me that in all his studies and travels Dr. Mack ended up moving into my neighborhood to further his studies in the Hudson Valley of New York, Dutchess County at that. I had the luck to briefly interview Dr. Mack at the 50th Anniversary of the Roswell Incident. Go figure.
I’m going to watch the broadcast as well to see if ABC, Ju Ju Chang the correspondent, and Dr. Clancy are going to present the solid evidence that is available especially the government released documents from the U.S., it’s allies, and enemies.
Seems like every country and their brother is forking over formerly classified UFO documents nowadays.
I wonder why?
It started promising but quickly degraded into the typical mainstream media mediocrity.
As soon as she brings in a headshrinker named Dr. Susan Clancy, yes that Dr. Susan Clancy, things go
downhill from there.
She doesn’t mention Dr. John E. Mack’s research nor the physical evidence, nor the mountains of
This is just a new wave of mainstream media looks into UFOs because their ratings are down and I have
an army of friends in the news business who tell me on a daily basis they have to do more coverage of
UFOs and the paranormal because they’re losing money pushing the typical hypnosis they call news.
Money is the issue here and they want to cover the issue without having to treat it seriously. I’m wondering
how many UFOlogists they’ve asked.