As part of his policy on transparency during his administration, the White House under President Obama has actually responded rather swiftly to inquiries regarding UFO and extraterrestrial questions posed by thousands who petitioned for answers.
It was Phil Larson of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy who explained on the White House website that,
“The U.S. government has no evidence that an life exists outside our planet, or that an extraterrestrial presence has contacted or engaged any member of the human race,” he continued with, “In addition, there is no credible information to suggest that any evidence is being hidden from the public’s eye.”
Well, in effect he’s telling what he’s told to tell. How the White House did such a thorough investigation so fast is astounding to anyone who has done the boots on the ground research in UFOlogy. There’s well over 60 years of extensive data that appears contrary to the White House findings. It’s obvious the President and his administration don’t want to get anywhere near anything UFO related. It’s still a hotbed issue that for some reason has more security and evasiveness for something that isn’t supposed to exist.
Any UFOlogist worth their email address can tell you the U.S. has lied through its teeth for decades regarding UFOs. The big question is why? The latest statement from the White House says there has been no coverup regarding UFOs but the solid irrefutable proof has been published for decades. Even some of America’s top officials have been listed on record as confirming the coverups. To have the White House tell the public the opposite while under this new administration of Barack Obama’s that promised transparency to issue these statements is just downright disappointing on a level that is laughable.
It shows that either the White House researchers are lazy, sloppy, incompetent, or just outright lying or misinformed. Even on that last point of being misinformed it sends out a signal of duplicity by other powers to whom the public’s right to know isn’t a priority anymore.
Back in the day when UFOs or Flying Saucers as they were first called during the late 1940s first appeared, the U.S. was very upfront about the matter and proposed the first theories that the saucers were of interplanetary origin. Their first scientific reports stated that the saucers were not only of interplanetary origin but weren’t a threat to national security.
That was until the Roswell Incident of July, 1947.
Suddenly the gameplay changed. Now Flying Saucers and UFOs were an issue to sweep under the rug. Several secret and above board agencies were dispatched to investigate the phenomenon and soon the CIA was formed later that year. The first director of the CIA was Admiral Roscoe Hillenkoetter. Mind you he was the FIRST director of the agency. He knew more about UFOs along with a few other officials than anyone else. Yet almost 11 years later, after a decade of sightings and incidents that even had UFOs fly over the White House twice or three times during 1951, the same Admiral Hillenkoetter wrote a letter to Congress that was published in the NY Times where he berates the U.S. for it’s new secrecy policy about UFOs. It was Hillenkoetter along with former Capt. Edward J. Ruppelt of the early UFO government studies such as Project Grudge and Project Blue Book and retired Air Force Maj. Donald Keyhoe the groundbreaker in UFO research and disclosure who opened the public’s eyes to what officially had been going on.
They all didn’t meet eye to eye but their intent was honorable and their research above respectable.
Hillenkoetter’s letter as well as tens of thousands of released documents from the U.S. and other countries shows without a doubt that UFOs are more than just figments of the imagination. Surely some accounts are but for the White House researchers to dish out a negatory in regards to the petitions, especially in the areas of a coverup are just downright unprofessional at the least.
One wonders, if the Obama Administration with all its rhetoric about being for the people are willing to play the UFO secrecy and avoidance game then that says more about their fears and the fact that the American public must always use their own resources to find answers since their government will not.
If you want to read the original letter to Congress by Admiral Hillenkoetter as well as analysis and verification of what he proclaimed you can click here.
Incoming search terms:
- white house addresses UFOs
- créature de roswell
- comments on the credibility of the roswell crash of july 1947
- space alien boots
- president obama releases on ufos
- paranormal creatures dead alien body
- obama says n ufos
- obama no ets nov 7 2011
- obama no ets
- cryptozoology findings
Nowdays there are so many UFO books and UFO documentaries as well as UFO news stories that you may not know where to turn to in order to get that pertinent information that you need. In this case it’s time for me to put up a bibliography of sorts so that you’ll know what UFO books to buy.
We’re now 60 years plus into this phenomenon and there have been numerous books and some are exceptional and some just nonsense. There is so much UFO information in the world now that it would take you decades to study it all. Fortunately there are some UFO books you can buy that will get you the basic reference material so that you’ll know the history of Unidentified Flying Objects and be able to hold your own in any debate as well as have a foundation on which to stand as you do your own research.
The history of UFOs is important because it gives you a timeline of events when the subject hit the mainstream. It shows you how people, and government reacted to the events and how they tried to tackle the problem. The main problem wasn’t that people were seeing UFOs, the problem was who or what was behind them.
To this day the government says one thing, often in sharp contrast to what government originally assessed. Knowing the sequence of events regarding their mysterious change in opinions and conclusions shows a solid modus operandi and leads to a clear assessment as to what government’s agenda is in regard to the subject. Studying about how civilian observers and researchers approached the problem and gathered their own conclusions paints a pretty solid picture of their endeavors.
Often you’ll hear people, especially the skeptics, debunkers, and arrogant UFOLogists talk about the “scientific model” in researching UFOs. One claims the other doesn’t apply it but don’t realize it’s not that old a model. Only been around over a hundred years. The bottom line is in being objective and most importantly having at the ready the basic reference material you need to make better assessments of what you’ve encountered, what evidence has been gathered, and how to interpret it without going off into scientific-wild-ass-guesses (s.w.a.g.), nor delusional-unscientific-mythological-based-ad hominem-sorta-scientific, assumptions. (d.u.m.b.a.s.s.)
There are some UFOlogists I don’t get along with personality-wise. Basically they’re very arrogant and condescending, some are blatant racists and sexists, and some are just downright unpleasant people to be around. However, their research skills may have gleaned information that others were unable to gather or too afraid to. I can recommend their works, not inviting them to dinner or playing with your kids and small household pets.
On the other hand there are some UFOlogists that are the nicest people I’ve ever met but couldn’t investigate the reason they got up in the morning. Their research suffers and although I may like them I couldn’t in all fairness recommend their books.
So with that being said, give me a while to whip up some books that you can use that covers the phenomenon and the related fields of study. I’ll post it here directly.
Incoming search terms:
- ufo books 2011
- best ufo books 2011
- best ufo books 2012
- best ufo books
- new ufo books 2011
- ufo books 2012
- best ufo book 2012
- Best ufo book of 2012
- new ufo books 2012
- top ufo books