<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNN Covers UFO Beliefs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ufomafia.com/blog/cnn-covers-ufo-beliefs/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ufomafia.com/blog/cnn-covers-ufo-beliefs?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=cnn-covers-ufo-beliefs</link>
	<description>Blog for the novel "The UFO Mafia" by Greg Boone</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:33:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stv Jns</title>
		<link>http://ufomafia.com/blog/cnn-covers-ufo-beliefs/comment-page-1#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Stv Jns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 02:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ufomafia.com/blog/?p=156#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Since this so-called &quot;professional journalist&quot; refers to people describing their real-life first-hand experiences as &quot;believers&quot;, which is a dismissive term implying lack of evidence, I have to question their ability to accurately report on their subject matter.  
 In fact I would have to say that these &quot;journalists&quot; appear to be &quot;believers&quot; in the unsubstantiated claim that UFOs do NOT represent a diverse class of unconventional technologies about which little is publicly known, even after many decades of &quot;professional journalism&quot;. 
  If this is what CNN claims to be their &quot;professional journalism&quot; about this obviously significant and complex issue, then I think its time to change the channel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since this so-called &#8220;professional journalist&#8221; refers to people describing their real-life first-hand experiences as &#8220;believers&#8221;, which is a dismissive term implying lack of evidence, I have to question their ability to accurately report on their subject matter.<br />
 In fact I would have to say that these &#8220;journalists&#8221; appear to be &#8220;believers&#8221; in the unsubstantiated claim that UFOs do NOT represent a diverse class of unconventional technologies about which little is publicly known, even after many decades of &#8220;professional journalism&#8221;.<br />
  If this is what CNN claims to be their &#8220;professional journalism&#8221; about this obviously significant and complex issue, then I think its time to change the channel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bible UFO &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Movie ufo</title>
		<link>http://ufomafia.com/blog/cnn-covers-ufo-beliefs/comment-page-1#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Bible UFO &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Movie ufo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ufomafia.com/blog/?p=156#comment-75</guid>
		<description>[...] This video segment is a very good example of professional journalism regarding the UFO issue. It brings professional people to the fore to discuss their experiences about the subject. Embedded video from CNN Video UFO News&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This video segment is a very good example of professional journalism regarding the UFO issue. It brings professional people to the fore to discuss their experiences about the subject. Embedded video from CNN Video UFO News&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

